1) Log into your account

2) Click on the “My Account” LInk toward the top of the page.  *Note Don’t select anything form the drop down box – click the words my account.

…. post moved to “http://howtocanx.com/how-to-cancel/net-nanny/” see the detail there!

Here is the email as I received it and I will conclude with my opinion of this whole thing:

For the past few years www.snopes.com has positioned itself, or others have labeled it as the ‘tell-all, final word’ on any comment, claim and e-mail.But for several years people tried to find out who exactly was behind snopes.com. Only recently did Wikipedia get to the bottom of it — kinda makes you wonder what they were hiding. Well, finally we know. It is run by a husband and wife team — that’s right, no big office of investigator sand researchers, no team of lawyers.

It’s just a mom-and-pop operation that began as a hobby. David and Barbara Mikkelson in the San Fernando Valley of California started the website about 13 years ago — and they have no formal background or experience in investigative research. After a few years it gained popularity believing it to be unbiased and neutral, but over the past couple of years people started asking questions who was behind it and did they have a selfish motivation? The reason for the questions — or skepticisms — is a result of snopes.com claiming to have the bottom line facts to certain questions or issues, when in fact, they have been proven wrong. Also, there were criticisms the Mikkelsons were not really investigating and getting to the ‘true’ bottom of various issues.

When I saw that Snopes had falsely claimed that Obama’s Birth Certificate had been properly validated, I realized something was wrong with either their research and/or their credibility. It seems something is seriously wrong with both. Then a few months ago, when my State Farm agent Bud Gregg in Mandeville hoisted a political sign referencing Barack Obama and made a big splash across the internet, supposedly the Mikkelson’s claim to have researched this issue before posting their findings on snopes.com. In their statement they claimed the corporate office of State Farm pressured Gregg into taking down the sign, when in fact nothing of the sort ever took place.

I personally contacted David Mikkelson (and he replied back to me) thinking he would want to get to the bottom of this, and I gave him Bud Gregg’s contact phone numbers. Bud was going to give him phone numbers to the big exec’s at State Farm in Illinois who would have been willing to speak with him about it. He never called Bud. In fact, I learned from Bud Gregg no one from snopes.com ever contacted anyone with State Farm. Yet snopes.com issued a statement as the ‘final factual word’ on the issue as if they did all their homework and got to the bottom of things. Not!

Then it has been learned the Mikkelson’s are very Democrat and extremely liberal. As we all now know from this presidential election, liberals have a purpose agenda to discredit anything that appears to be  onservative. There has been much criticism lately over the internet with people pointing out the Mikkelson’s liberalism revealing itself in their website findings. Gee, what a shock! They were also big supporters of both Clintons and used Snopes to “debunk” any criticism of the Clintons without checking the validity of the item.

So, I say this now to everyone who goes to snopes.com to get what they think to be the bottom line facts: Proceed with caution. Take what it says at face value and nothing more, and understand their liberal agenda. Use it only to lead you to their references where you can link to and read the sources for yourself. Plus, you can always google a subject and do the research yourself. It now seems apparent that’s all the Mikkelson’s do. After all, I can personally vouch from my own experience for their ‘not’ fully looking into things.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snopes.com

Looking at this email at first glance it is a hit on snopes being a valid source for information, run by a mom and pop and used only to spread it’s liberal word to the rest of the world… I wouldn’t disagree with this 100% so lets really break this down – snopes style ;o)

 ”For the past few years www.snopes.com has positioned itself, or others have labeled it as the ‘tell-all, final word’ on any comment, claim and e-mail. But for several years people tried to find out who exactly was behind snopes.com. Only recently did Wikipedia get to the bottom of it — kinda makes you wonder what they were hiding. Well, finally we know. It is run by a husband and wife team — that’s right, no big office of investigator sand researchers, no team of lawyers:

If you visit the FAQ page of Snopes you will find that it actually states:

Q: How do I know the information you’ve presented is accurate?

A: We don’t expect anyone to accept us as the ultimate authority on any topic. Unlike the plethora of anonymous individuals who create and send the unsigned, unsourced e-mail messages that are forwarded all over the Internet, we show our work. The research materials we’ve used in the preparation of any particular page are listed in the bibliography displayed at the bottom of that page so that readers who wish to verify the validity of our information may check those sources for themselves.

So we know from their own FAQ section that they are showing sources to their claims and you can see this in most if not all of their posts if you want to do your own research on the facts they present.

Next the first paragraph says that Wiki finally got to the bottom of this. If you know anything about Wiki.org this is a silly statement – why? Wiki.org is in-fact a community website, meaning that you, me or anyone else and their mom can register with Wiki and write/add/delete any part of their website. SOOO what that means if you are knocking on snopes becuase it is run by two people, then don’t say that Wiki is any better because the fact the matter is Wiki is written by anyone and everyone. Please understand that Wiki has people who moderate, validate and try to ensure that what has been posted is well referenced and if it isn’t then they make a change on the website – again you can do this too.

Finally on the first paragraph it says Wiki uncovered that this is run by two people – if you care to look at the FAQ page of snopes they make this same statement and don’t hide it – so did Wiki uncover anything or just post the facts already stated on the snopes website. http://www.snopes.com/info/faq.asp

 It’s just a mom-and-pop operation that began as a hobby. David and Barbara Mikkelson in the San Fernando Valley of California started the website about 13 years ago — and they have no formal background or experience in investigative research. After a few years it gained popularity believing it to be unbiased and neutral, but over the past couple of years people started asking questions who was behind it and did they have a selfish motivation? The reason for the questions — or skepticisms — is a result of snopes.com claiming to have the bottom line facts to certain questions or issues, when in fact, they have been proven wrong. Also, there were criticisms the Mikkelsons were not really investigating and getting to the ‘true’ bottom of various issues.

This 2nd paragraph is also much of the same – you can find this out on the snopes FAQ page so I don’t need to say anything on that. What is key here is they are trying to dis-prove snopes as valid when again they do post their references to what they are proving or disproving on their website – could the snopes posts be  wrong? Absolutely, but again the Internet has so much information and if you want to research something your going to get a TON of information and picking through it to find the truth is very tuff – why? Because everyone has an opinion or a direction they lean and the media is no different. This fact alone is why emails get forwarded without research and why wiki and snopes are popular becuase for the most part some sort references are given which is where they pull their facts from to draw a conclusion.

 When I saw that Snopes had falsely claimed that Obama’s Birth Certificate had been properly validated, I realized something was wrong with either their research and/or their credibility. It seems something is seriously wrong with both. Then a few months ago, when my State Farm agent Bud Gregg in Mandeville hoisted a political sign referencing Barack Obama and made a big splash across the internet, supposedly the Mikkelson’s claim to have researched this issue before posting their findings on snopes.com. In their statement they claimed the corporate office of State Farm pressured Gregg into taking down the sign, when in fact nothing of the sort ever took place.

The 3rd paragraph is getting more specific becuase it references “When I saw that…” okay who is the “I” in this statement, this email neither contained any source information of who wrote it (most emails like this do not) and probably never will… so if I’m lead to belive that the “I” was the person who sent me this email then I’m hitting delete becuase I know the kind of emails that they send and don’t believe that they did some great undercover research to find out all the facts – but I (Jason Archer, the owner of this blog) will move on.

As for the rest of this paragraph I’ll point you to snopes and why they said the birth certificate was valid… again look at the sources – http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/birthcertificate.asp  and http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/citizen.asp

If you find their results as false then that is your choice – but to me this is something that clues me in that this email is being sent out by those that are against Obama and want to think that he has made it past all checks and balances that the US has and somehow became president on false documents and rights. If this is the case then I can think of no one else better to run a country if he is infact this slick and powerful he could have taken over China using the same techniques and they could be invading the US right now and literally running over each and every defense we have with just pure numbers using table spoons as their only weapon… come on people!

I personally contacted David Mikkelson (and he replied back to me) thinking he would want to get to the bottom of this, and I gave him Bud Gregg’s contact phone numbers. Bud was going to give him phone numbers to the big exec’s at State Farm in Illinois who would have been willing to speak with him about it. He never called Bud. In fact, I learned from Bud Gregg no one from snopes.com ever contacted anyone with State Farm. Yet snopes.com issued a statement as the ‘final factual word’ on the issue as if they did all their homework and got to the bottom of things. Not!

The 4th paragraph is much of the same becuase we still don’t know who “I” is but we have some names and a quick check of Bud Gregg on snopes leads us to the following link – http://www.snopes.com/photos/politics/chicken.asp and on it’s page it does agree that they never contacted Bud to get the “Truth” so what it’s saying is that Bud Gregg knows the real truth and we know this because he puts statements above his state farm sign saying things like “A Taxpayer voting for Barack Obama is like a chicken voting for Colonel Sanders” – to me this sounds like a very level headed, fact based individual who is NOT putting his personal opinions into his statements (what is it this email says at the end of this paragraph)… Not!

Now trying to research Mr. Gregg; if you google it you will find this email and his sign but what I found most interesting was searching for him on the state-farm website I couldn’t find him… http://online2.statefarm.com/b2c/sf/AgentLocator – maybe he isn’t in Texas anymore or maybe he is so damn good he isn’t on the agent locator because he was fired?? Haha either way I don’t care but I can’t find info on statefarms website which leads me to draw a self-serving conclusion that even if David Mikkelson did contact State Farm they likely wouldn’t support his claim to fame or he would be still working for them… or maybe he got hired by Geico – I dunno… moving on.

Then it has been learned the Mikkelson’s are very Democrat and extremely liberal. As we all now know from this presidential election, liberals have a purpose agenda to discredit anything that appears to be  conservative. There has been much criticism lately over the internet with people pointing out the Mikkelson’s liberalism revealing itself in their website findings. Gee, what a shock! They were also big supporters of both Clintons and used Snopes to “debunk” any criticism of the Clintons without checking the validity of the item.

The 5th paragraph points to the Mikkelson’s personal agenda to take over the world with Snopes. Yet again it references  that all the Clinton posts on snopes show no references to validate the claims – I don’t have the time or inclination to pull all of these up but with a simple search on snopes you can find this out for yourself.

 So, I say this now to everyone who goes to www.snopes.com to get what they think to be the bottom line facts: Proceed with caution. Take what it says at face value and nothing more, and understand their liberal agenda. Use it only to lead you to their references where you can link to and read the sources for yourself. Plus, you can always google a subject and do the research yourself. It now seems apparent that’s all the Mikkelson’s do. After all, I can personally vouch from my own experience for their ‘not’ fully looking into things.

The 6th paragraph is probably the only thing closes to good advice this whole email has – but falls short in of itself.  First it shows that the person who wrote this – the mysterious “I” – has always been the type to take everything on the Internet as face value, up until now where they realize that they should “proceed with caution” and now recommend that others do the same. Well how about that”I” – you can teach old dogs new tricks. Additionally “I” recommends that you search for facts yourself – NOW STOP THAT… what kind of an idea is that? If you were to do that I wouldn’t get half the crap I receive via email because people would fact check themselves? WOW glad “I” FINALLY figured this one out.

The paragraph concludes with the famous “I” having personally found Snopes doesn’t look into things fully… if you define fully as knowing all the facts before you open your mouth, send out an email or blog about something then even I wouldn’t have this blog posts because knowing all the facts is IMPOSSIBLE.

To conclude on this whole LONG post. I read this email and conclude the same thing I conclude every time I see things like this. First – do your research, yourself. Don’t depend on Snoopes, Wiki, My blog, your BFF’s email or anyone else as the only truth. Draw your own conclusion but don’t do what you despise and send it out as the FULL truth  to all of your friends or you might as well say an incantation before hitting send and add “Send this to 10 of your friends and you will get a phone call from your dead cousin telling you the meaning of life and where to find the lost city of Atlantis”.

Hope you enjoyed because if you didn’t and you read this entire thing those are 15 minutes of your life you will never get back.

Jason

Sports Authority’s next Friends & Family event will be held
Thursday, July 16^th through Saturday, July 18^th, 2009.

The attached discount coupon is good at all Sports Authority locations.
The discount is 25% off any single item – exclusions apply, please see coupon for details.

One coupon per customer.
Coupon must be surrendered at time of purchase.

See coupon for online Friends and Family code and additional details.

An electronic copy is attached here to e-mail to your friends and family members.

Sports Authority 25% Off Coupon

Once you get an email that you have been charged for a subscription payment for a clickbank subscription, simply forward the email to-

… Post moved to “http://howtocanx.com/how-to-cancel/clickbank-subscriptions/” see details there.

As you may have expected, the new website is www.thediscountclothes.co.uk – enjoy.

It is amazing to note that even in today’s world, witchcraft is looked upon as something evil. People who follow this faith are often said to adore the devil himself. This is far from the truth. Just like in all facets of life, there are bad sheep everywhere; but that is no reason to label witchcraft as an evil.

Read more at -http://www.witchingsecrets.com/

INSIDER INFO – Fuel prices will take a MAJOR INCREASE on SATURDAY and THROUGHOUT THE WEEKEND.  Prices will rise by as much as 19 CENTS on Saturday (July 12).

FILL UP and TOP OFF FRIDAY before 23:59

AVOID the HIGH PRICED WEEKEND FUEL.

Click the image to see full screen shot or view auctions on eBay.

Jason

PennDOT recommends the routes below for detours around the closure of I-95. Because of low bridges, large trucks are advised to avoid the shorter Aramingo Ave. detours and to take the Woodhaven Road/Roosevelt Boulevard detour.

I95 down for construction due to cracked pillar – est repair anywhere from 3 to 5 days – we will see though

Barack Obama

Cell Phone Directory and Telemarketers

Ashley Flores

‘Life Is Beautiful’ Virus

Reachelle Marie Smith

Invitation/Olympic Torch

Hillary Clinton

Lemon Wedges

#77 or *677 Cell Phone Notification

Social Security

Starbucks

809 Area Code Scam

Aspartame

Berkeley vs. the Marines

New Dollar Coin and ‘In God We Trust’

#-9-0 Phone Scam

Jury Duty Scam

Dust Off

PPA Recall Alert

Slow Dance / Amy Bruce

USS New York

Jay Leno

ATM Reverse PIN Panic Code

Bill Gates / Microsoft / AOL Giveaway

‘You aint gonna like losing.’ Author unknown.

President Bush did make a bad mistake in the war on terrorism. But the
mistake was not his decision to go to war in Iraq .

Bush’s mistake came in his belief that this country is the same one his
father fought for in WWII. It is not.

Back then, they had just come out of a vicious depression. The country was
steeled by the hardship of that depression, but they still believed
fervently in this country. They knew that the people had elected their
leaders, so it was the people’s duty to back those leaders.

Therefore, when the war broke out the people came together, rallied behind,
and stuck with their leaders, whether they had voted for them or not or
whether the war was going badly or not.

And war was just as distasteful and the anguish just as great then as it is
today. Often there were more casualties in one day in WWII than we have had
in the entire Iraq war. But that did not matter The people stuck with the
President because it was their patriotic duty Americans put aside their
differences in WWII and worked together to win that war.

Everyone from every strata of society, from young to old pitched in. Small
children pulled little wagons around to gather scrap metal for the war
effort. Grade school students saved their pennies to buy stamps for war
bonds to help the effort.

Men who were too old or medically 4F lied about their age or condition
trying their best to join the military. Women doubled their work to keep
things going at home. Harsh rationing of everything from gasoline to soap,
to butter was imposed, yet there was very l ittl e complaining.
You never heard prominent people on the radio belittling the President.
Interestingly enough in those days there were no fat cat actors and
entertainers who ran off to visit and fawn over dictators of hostile
countries and complain to them about our President. Instead, they made
upbeat films and entertained our troops to help the troops’ morale. And a
bunch even enlisted.

And imagine this: Teachers in schools actually started the day off with a
Pledge of Allegiance, and with prayers for our country and our troops!
Back then, no newspaper would have dared point out certain weak spots in
our cities where bombs could be set off to cause the maximum damage. No
newspaper would have dared com plain about what we were doing to catch
spies.

A newspaper would have been laughed out of existence if it had complained
that German or Japanese soldiers were being ‘tortured’ by being forced to
wear women’s underwear, or subjected to interrogation by a woman, or being
scared by a dog or did not have air conditioning.

There were a lot of things different back then. We were not subjected to a
constant bombardment of pornography, perversion and promiscuity in movies
or on radio. We did not have legions of crackheads, dope pushers and armed
gangs roaming our streets.

No, President Bush did not make a mistake in his handling of terrorism. He
made the mistake of believing that we still had the courage and fortitude
of our fathers. He believed that this was still the country that our
fathers fought so dearly to preserve.

It is not the same country. It is now a cross between Sodom and Gomorra and
the land of Oz. We did unite for a short while after 9/11, but our attitude
changed when we found out that defending our country would require some
sacrifices.

We are in great danger. The terrorists are fanatic Muslims. They believe
that it is okay, even their duty to kill anyone who will not convert to
Islam. It has been estimated that about one third or over three hundred
million Muslims are sympathetic to the terrorists cause…Hitler and Tojo
combined did not have nearly that many potential recruits.

So…we either win it – or lose it – and you ain’t gonna like losing.

America is not at war. The military is at war. America is at the mall.

While trying to get everything to really work together I have decided to go ahead and just bring it all down and put it back together again… so please give me a few days to get everything running and enjoy the new archerworks.com.

Jason